<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 287 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218272</link>
    <description>The High Court quashes the impugned notice dated 30.03.2012, finding that the corrigendum order, passed without notice to the petitioner, lacked legal standing. The Court criticizes the tax authorities for attempting to circumvent jurisdictional issues, emphasizing the importance of following legal procedures in tax assessments. The Revenue is ordered to pay costs to the petitioner, and directions are given to prevent similar incidents in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 287 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218272</link>
      <description>The High Court quashes the impugned notice dated 30.03.2012, finding that the corrigendum order, passed without notice to the petitioner, lacked legal standing. The Court criticizes the tax authorities for attempting to circumvent jurisdictional issues, emphasizing the importance of following legal procedures in tax assessments. The Revenue is ordered to pay costs to the petitioner, and directions are given to prevent similar incidents in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>