<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 282 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging various additions made by the Assessing Officer, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions. The Tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections and appeals for different assessment years. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute municipal values for properties not let out as the basis for annual value for multiple assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 282 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging various additions made by the Assessing Officer, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletions. The Tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections and appeals for different assessment years. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to compute municipal values for properties not let out as the basis for annual value for multiple assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>