<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 272 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act. However, the Tribunal remanded the issues of unverifiable expenses related to repairs, maintenance, traveling, and miscellaneous expenses back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration due to lack of verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 272 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act. However, the Tribunal remanded the issues of unverifiable expenses related to repairs, maintenance, traveling, and miscellaneous expenses back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration due to lack of verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>