<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218256</link>
    <description>Depreciation on a leasehold office building was treated as allowable where the assessee had possession, business use and tax payments in its own name, despite no registered conveyance deed. Foreign travel for international sugar-trade meetings, provident fund trust contributions within prescribed time, and valuation of closing stock at lower of cost or market value were also upheld as deductible or acceptable on the facts and on consistency with prior years. For section 14A, Rule 8D was not applied for the year and disallowance was confined to a reasonable estimate, with no interest disallowance. Interest on income-tax refund and levy of section 234D interest were remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 271 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218256</link>
      <description>Depreciation on a leasehold office building was treated as allowable where the assessee had possession, business use and tax payments in its own name, despite no registered conveyance deed. Foreign travel for international sugar-trade meetings, provident fund trust contributions within prescribed time, and valuation of closing stock at lower of cost or market value were also upheld as deductible or acceptable on the facts and on consistency with prior years. For section 14A, Rule 8D was not applied for the year and disallowance was confined to a reasonable estimate, with no interest disallowance. Interest on income-tax refund and levy of section 234D interest were remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>