<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218255</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the DIT(E) was not justified in denying the renewal of approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that the trust&#039;s activities were charitable and for the benefit of a section of the public, and that the DIT(E) had failed to provide a sufficient opportunity of being heard. Consequently, the Tribunal directed that the approval under section 80G(5)(vi) should be granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218255</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the DIT(E) was not justified in denying the renewal of approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that the trust&#039;s activities were charitable and for the benefit of a section of the public, and that the DIT(E) had failed to provide a sufficient opportunity of being heard. Consequently, the Tribunal directed that the approval under section 80G(5)(vi) should be granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>