<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 257 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a duty of Rs. 12,51,200 against the appellant for the reversal of Cenvat credit on the removal of old capital goods. The decision was based on previous Tribunal rulings and High Court confirmations in similar cases, disregarding a conflicting view from a Larger Bench decision. The Tribunal opted to follow the High Court decisions, allowing stay petitions without pre-deposit and scheduling final disposal based on existing legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 257 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a duty of Rs. 12,51,200 against the appellant for the reversal of Cenvat credit on the removal of old capital goods. The decision was based on previous Tribunal rulings and High Court confirmations in similar cases, disregarding a conflicting view from a Larger Bench decision. The Tribunal opted to follow the High Court decisions, allowing stay petitions without pre-deposit and scheduling final disposal based on existing legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>