<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 237 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218222</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s appeal, upholding their eligibility for a cash refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5. The decision was based on the export-oriented nature of the business and the lack of domestic clearances for utilizing the credit, determining that the manufacturer met the criteria for the refund. The tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision illogical and concluded that the manufacturer was entitled to the Cenvat credit on packing material used for exports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 237 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218222</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s appeal, upholding their eligibility for a cash refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5. The decision was based on the export-oriented nature of the business and the lack of domestic clearances for utilizing the credit, determining that the manufacturer met the criteria for the refund. The tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision illogical and concluded that the manufacturer was entitled to the Cenvat credit on packing material used for exports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>