https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218189 The Tribunal granted an ad interim stay of recovery of a duty amount of Rs.3,70,927/-, finding that the demand quantified by the Central Excise Range Superintendent without concurrence of the original authority should not be enforced during the appeal's pendency. The appellant's contention that the lack of a show cause notice before re-quantification of the demand rendered it unsustainable was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized that the demand worked out without concurrence of the original authority should not be enforced, leading to the grant of the appellant's prayer for an interim stay of recovery of the demanded amount. en-us Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218189 The Tribunal granted an ad interim stay of recovery of a duty amount of Rs.3,70,927/-, finding that the demand quantified by the Central Excise Range Superintendent without concurrence of the original authority should not be enforced during the appeal's pendency. The appellant's contention that the lack of a show cause notice before re-quantification of the demand rendered it unsustainable was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized that the demand worked out without concurrence of the original authority should not be enforced, leading to the grant of the appellant's prayer for an interim stay of recovery of the demanded amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218189