<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 191 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218176</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) on the assessee for filing a return containing inaccurate particulars. The Court emphasized the need for a clear understanding of the provisions governing succession and the carry forward of losses under the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the assessee due to the lack of clarity in the authorities&#039; understanding and the debatable nature of the point regarding the inadmissibility of setting off losses from a partnership firm against individual income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 191 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218176</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) on the assessee for filing a return containing inaccurate particulars. The Court emphasized the need for a clear understanding of the provisions governing succession and the carry forward of losses under the Income Tax Act, ruling in favor of the assessee due to the lack of clarity in the authorities&#039; understanding and the debatable nature of the point regarding the inadmissibility of setting off losses from a partnership firm against individual income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>