<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 180 - ITAT, INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the assessee company to carry forward and set off business losses/unabsorbed depreciation from earlier assessment years post-amalgamation. The Tribunal found that the amalgamation was not solely for the benefit of carrying forward losses, and there was no violation of provisions. It held that section 72A did not apply to the brought forward losses of the amalgamated company. The Tribunal emphasized the High Courts&#039; approval of the amalgamation scheme, stating that once sanctioned, it binds all parties, including tax authorities. Consequently, both appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 07:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 180 - ITAT, INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the assessee company to carry forward and set off business losses/unabsorbed depreciation from earlier assessment years post-amalgamation. The Tribunal found that the amalgamation was not solely for the benefit of carrying forward losses, and there was no violation of provisions. It held that section 72A did not apply to the brought forward losses of the amalgamated company. The Tribunal emphasized the High Courts&#039; approval of the amalgamation scheme, stating that once sanctioned, it binds all parties, including tax authorities. Consequently, both appeals by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>