https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218160 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions that the advertisement expenditure was revenue in nature and that the Resale Price Method was appropriate for determining the Arm's Length Price for international transactions. The issue of marketing fee payments was remanded back to the AO for verification of services received, with directions to allow the deduction if benefits from the cost-sharing arrangement were substantiated. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218160 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions that the advertisement expenditure was revenue in nature and that the Resale Price Method was appropriate for determining the Arm's Length Price for international transactions. The issue of marketing fee payments was remanded back to the AO for verification of services received, with directions to allow the deduction if benefits from the cost-sharing arrangement were substantiated. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218160