<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 170 - Kerala High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218155</link>
    <description>The court found that while the prohibitory orders for recovery of tax arrears could not be fully upheld, it was necessary to impose conditions to restrain recovery efforts. The court directed the respondents to halt the recovery steps until the resolution of pending legal matters, requiring the petitioner to remit a percentage of the amount under demand by a specified date to maintain the stay on recovery actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 170 - Kerala High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218155</link>
      <description>The court found that while the prohibitory orders for recovery of tax arrears could not be fully upheld, it was necessary to impose conditions to restrain recovery efforts. The court directed the respondents to halt the recovery steps until the resolution of pending legal matters, requiring the petitioner to remit a percentage of the amount under demand by a specified date to maintain the stay on recovery actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>