<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218150</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the addition related to SAP implementation charges while upholding the TPO&#039;s NIL ALP determination for management and professional fees. The tribunal emphasized the need for separate benchmarking of each transaction and supported the use of the CUP method over the TNMM method for the impugned transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218150</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the addition related to SAP implementation charges while upholding the TPO&#039;s NIL ALP determination for management and professional fees. The tribunal emphasized the need for separate benchmarking of each transaction and supported the use of the CUP method over the TNMM method for the impugned transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>