<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 154 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross objection. The Tribunal confirmed that the refund claim arising from the finalization of the provisional assessment was not subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment, and the assessee was entitled to the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 154 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross objection. The Tribunal confirmed that the refund claim arising from the finalization of the provisional assessment was not subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment, and the assessee was entitled to the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>