<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218136</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, modifying the pre-deposit amount to Rs. 1.5 Crores and securing the balance through a bond. The Court stressed the importance of considering production capacity, financial hardship, and objective evidence in excise duty cases. It highlighted the necessity for a thorough assessment before imposing significant financial burdens on appellants and ensuring a fair balance between the parties involved in such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218136</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, modifying the pre-deposit amount to Rs. 1.5 Crores and securing the balance through a bond. The Court stressed the importance of considering production capacity, financial hardship, and objective evidence in excise duty cases. It highlighted the necessity for a thorough assessment before imposing significant financial burdens on appellants and ensuring a fair balance between the parties involved in such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>