<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 141 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218126</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of evidence of inaccurate particulars of income. The delay in filing the appeal was not condoned, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility for timely compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 141 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218126</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to the absence of evidence of inaccurate particulars of income. The delay in filing the appeal was not condoned, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s responsibility for timely compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>