<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 133 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the reassessment proceedings, ruling the initiation was not legal. It found the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief on income escapement not bona fide, as the investment in specified long-term assets complied with the law. The Tribunal highlighted mutually contradictory reasons for reopening assessment, deeming the belief not genuine. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the cross-objection and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 133 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the reassessment proceedings, ruling the initiation was not legal. It found the Assessing Officer&#039;s belief on income escapement not bona fide, as the investment in specified long-term assets complied with the law. The Tribunal highlighted mutually contradictory reasons for reopening assessment, deeming the belief not genuine. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the cross-objection and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>