<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty for the undisclosed income of Rs. 16.25 lakh, as the assessee failed to substantiate its explanation. The penalty was not imposed on the enhanced amount of Rs. 2,23,039/-. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming the penalty on the reduced amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty for the undisclosed income of Rs. 16.25 lakh, as the assessee failed to substantiate its explanation. The penalty was not imposed on the enhanced amount of Rs. 2,23,039/-. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming the penalty on the reduced amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>