<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 128 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal, as the respondent&#039;s refund claim for service tax paid was found to be time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal rejected the respondent&#039;s arguments that the time limit should not apply due to a misunderstanding of the law and that a letter sent in 2009 could be considered an application for refund. The Tribunal emphasized that the claim did not meet the statutory requirements and upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 128 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal, as the respondent&#039;s refund claim for service tax paid was found to be time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal rejected the respondent&#039;s arguments that the time limit should not apply due to a misunderstanding of the law and that a letter sent in 2009 could be considered an application for refund. The Tribunal emphasized that the claim did not meet the statutory requirements and upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>