<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 98 - ITAT, Pune</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain additions under section 68 of the IT Act, except for a specific loan, directing the AO to allow the assessee to produce the creditor to establish creditworthiness. The burden of proof was deemed met by the assessee, leading to the appeal being allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 98 - ITAT, Pune</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain additions under section 68 of the IT Act, except for a specific loan, directing the AO to allow the assessee to produce the creditor to establish creditworthiness. The burden of proof was deemed met by the assessee, leading to the appeal being allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>