<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218065</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitioner, a Private Limited Company, to restore its company name in the Register of Companies under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner was directed to file overdue documents and pay a cost of Rs.50,000 to the Central Government. Upon compliance, the Registrar of Companies was instructed to restore the company&#039;s name, enabling it to be reinstated in the Register of Companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218065</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitioner, a Private Limited Company, to restore its company name in the Register of Companies under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner was directed to file overdue documents and pay a cost of Rs.50,000 to the Central Government. Upon compliance, the Registrar of Companies was instructed to restore the company&#039;s name, enabling it to be reinstated in the Register of Companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>