<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 73 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218058</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that availing Cenvat Credit on input services distributed to various units beyond the place of removal for transportation to customers was not permissible. The Tribunal also ruled that availing Cenvat Credit on Goods Transport Agency services beyond the place of removal was not within the scope of input service as defined in the rules. Regarding the requirement of pre-deposit, the majority decision granted a 100% waiver, leading to the waiver of the demands and staying the recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 73 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218058</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that availing Cenvat Credit on input services distributed to various units beyond the place of removal for transportation to customers was not permissible. The Tribunal also ruled that availing Cenvat Credit on Goods Transport Agency services beyond the place of removal was not within the scope of input service as defined in the rules. Regarding the requirement of pre-deposit, the majority decision granted a 100% waiver, leading to the waiver of the demands and staying the recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>