<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218049</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate income particulars related to a deduction claim under section 80HHC for A.Y. 1991-92 was canceled. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing the debatable nature of the deduction issue, indicating no concealment or inaccurate particulars. Similarly, the disallowance of excess remuneration to Managing and Executive Directors for A.Y. 2004-05 under section 40A(2)(a) was deleted. The Tribunal found the remuneration within limits set by the Companies Act, citing Company Law Board approval as indicative of reasonableness, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218049</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate income particulars related to a deduction claim under section 80HHC for A.Y. 1991-92 was canceled. The Tribunal upheld the decision, emphasizing the debatable nature of the deduction issue, indicating no concealment or inaccurate particulars. Similarly, the disallowance of excess remuneration to Managing and Executive Directors for A.Y. 2004-05 under section 40A(2)(a) was deleted. The Tribunal found the remuneration within limits set by the Companies Act, citing Company Law Board approval as indicative of reasonableness, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>