<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 48 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218033</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner to invoke revisional powers under section 263. The Court found no substantial questions of law decided wrongly by the Tribunal and concluded that the remand order to the original Assessing Officer was valid. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the Commissioner&#039;s order was not erroneous, and there was no reason to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 48 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218033</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the jurisdiction of the Commissioner to invoke revisional powers under section 263. The Court found no substantial questions of law decided wrongly by the Tribunal and concluded that the remand order to the original Assessing Officer was valid. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the Commissioner&#039;s order was not erroneous, and there was no reason to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>