<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 43 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218028</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled on the eligibility of CENVAT credit for service tax paid on GTA service, tyre retreading service, and shifting of household articles of employees. The Tribunal allowed the credit for GTA services, upheld the demand for service tax on shifting household goods of employees, and considered tyre retreading as part of vehicle maintenance, allowing the benefit of service tax credit. The penalty was set aside, and both appeals were declared accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 43 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218028</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled on the eligibility of CENVAT credit for service tax paid on GTA service, tyre retreading service, and shifting of household articles of employees. The Tribunal allowed the credit for GTA services, upheld the demand for service tax on shifting household goods of employees, and considered tyre retreading as part of vehicle maintenance, allowing the benefit of service tax credit. The penalty was set aside, and both appeals were declared accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>