<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 40 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218025</link>
    <description>Permanent structure for eviction purposes is assessed on the facts of each case, by examining the intention behind the work, its nature and extent, the materials used, durability, removability without substantial damage, and the purpose of the construction. The text states that replacement of a tin-sheet roof with a cement concrete slab and construction of a passage were treated as lasting structural changes rather than temporary repairs, and that absence of additional usable floor area does not exclude Section 108(p) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The stated consequence is that such alterations may constitute erection of a permanent structure without the landlord&#039;s consent under Section 13(1)(b) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 40 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218025</link>
      <description>Permanent structure for eviction purposes is assessed on the facts of each case, by examining the intention behind the work, its nature and extent, the materials used, durability, removability without substantial damage, and the purpose of the construction. The text states that replacement of a tin-sheet roof with a cement concrete slab and construction of a passage were treated as lasting structural changes rather than temporary repairs, and that absence of additional usable floor area does not exclude Section 108(p) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The stated consequence is that such alterations may constitute erection of a permanent structure without the landlord&#039;s consent under Section 13(1)(b) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>