<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 30 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution by directing the appeal to be heard on merits. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal found the relevant rule allowing dismissal for default of appearance to be invalid and ordered the restoration of the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of ensuring a fair hearing and providing notice to both the applicant and their current counsel for the upcoming proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 30 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the appeal dismissed for non-prosecution by directing the appeal to be heard on merits. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal found the relevant rule allowing dismissal for default of appearance to be invalid and ordered the restoration of the appeal. The decision emphasized the importance of ensuring a fair hearing and providing notice to both the applicant and their current counsel for the upcoming proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>