<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 24 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218009</link>
    <description>Clearances of branded goods and unbranded goods had to be treated separately under Notification No. 8/02 because branded goods were excluded from the small scale exemption computation on a plain reading of paragraphs 3 and 4. The assessee&#039;s branded clearances could not be clubbed with unbranded clearances to deny SSI benefit, and the exemption was therefore upheld. The cited Supreme Court ruling was distinguished because it concerned a different factual setting and a different controversy over branded goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 24 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218009</link>
      <description>Clearances of branded goods and unbranded goods had to be treated separately under Notification No. 8/02 because branded goods were excluded from the small scale exemption computation on a plain reading of paragraphs 3 and 4. The assessee&#039;s branded clearances could not be clubbed with unbranded clearances to deny SSI benefit, and the exemption was therefore upheld. The cited Supreme Court ruling was distinguished because it concerned a different factual setting and a different controversy over branded goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>