<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 15 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal followed the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, stating that no addition can be made in the hands of the firm for fresh capital introduced by a partner unless the source of investment by the partner remains unexplained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 15 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal followed the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, stating that no addition can be made in the hands of the firm for fresh capital introduced by a partner unless the source of investment by the partner remains unexplained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>