<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 13 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217998</link>
    <description>For life insurance business, profits were required to be computed under the special scheme in section 44 read with rule 2 of the First Schedule on the basis of actuarial surplus, not the &quot;total surplus&quot; in IRDA Form I, and internal transfers between policyholder and shareholder accounts were treated as tax-neutral. Section 14A was held inapplicable to insurance income computed under that special regime. Income from the shareholder&#039;s account was not separately taxable as income from other sources, and the claimed exemptions were allowed. Additions for negative reserve and 100% depreciation were also not sustained because the special actuarial and accounting basis governed the computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 13 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217998</link>
      <description>For life insurance business, profits were required to be computed under the special scheme in section 44 read with rule 2 of the First Schedule on the basis of actuarial surplus, not the &quot;total surplus&quot; in IRDA Form I, and internal transfers between policyholder and shareholder accounts were treated as tax-neutral. Section 14A was held inapplicable to insurance income computed under that special regime. Income from the shareholder&#039;s account was not separately taxable as income from other sources, and the claimed exemptions were allowed. Additions for negative reserve and 100% depreciation were also not sustained because the special actuarial and accounting basis governed the computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>