<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 9 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalty for disallowance of capital expenditure on R&amp;amp;D. However, the penalties related to unutilized Modvat Credit and excess depreciation on motor vehicles were deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantiating claims with genuine evidence and distinguished between debatable and bogus claims, stating that the latter warrants penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 9 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the penalty for disallowance of capital expenditure on R&amp;amp;D. However, the penalties related to unutilized Modvat Credit and excess depreciation on motor vehicles were deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantiating claims with genuine evidence and distinguished between debatable and bogus claims, stating that the latter warrants penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>