<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 7 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs.80,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share application money received. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 7 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs.80,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share application money received. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>