https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217983 A point not argued or decided in earlier 1982-83 levy sugar price proceedings did not bind petitioners who specifically raised the State Advised Price objection, so the challenge was not barred by sub silentio. The Court treated the SAP-based contention as maintainable and held that, if the retrospective validating amendment ultimately failed, the Central Government would have to reconsider the 1982-83 levy sugar price by taking the higher SAP into account. Immediate monetary relief was therefore not granted, and the pricing issue remained contingent on the outcome of the Supreme Court proceedings. en-us Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217983 A point not argued or decided in earlier 1982-83 levy sugar price proceedings did not bind petitioners who specifically raised the State Advised Price objection, so the challenge was not barred by sub silentio. The Court treated the SAP-based contention as maintainable and held that, if the retrospective validating amendment ultimately failed, the Central Government would have to reconsider the 1982-83 levy sugar price by taking the higher SAP into account. Immediate monetary relief was therefore not granted, and the pricing issue remained contingent on the outcome of the Supreme Court proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217983