<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 918 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217981</link>
    <description>Domestic industry status was upheld where the sole petitioner accounted for a substantial share of domestic production and other domestic producers had imported the subject goods during the investigation period. Denial of market economy status to the exporters was also upheld because the determination rested on an overall assessment of distorted cost factors, including non-market procurement of raw material and state-guided utility pricing, making domestic costs and prices unreliable for normal value purposes. The normal value method was, however, modified because the original basis was unsustainable; the alternative method using average consumption norms of cooperative exporters was accepted, and the anti-dumping duty was reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 918 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217981</link>
      <description>Domestic industry status was upheld where the sole petitioner accounted for a substantial share of domestic production and other domestic producers had imported the subject goods during the investigation period. Denial of market economy status to the exporters was also upheld because the determination rested on an overall assessment of distorted cost factors, including non-market procurement of raw material and state-guided utility pricing, making domestic costs and prices unreliable for normal value purposes. The normal value method was, however, modified because the original basis was unsustainable; the alternative method using average consumption norms of cooperative exporters was accepted, and the anti-dumping duty was reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>