<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 898 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not justified as the assessee had disclosed all material facts and the claim for depreciation on farm house and commercial flats was made in a bona fide manner. The appeal of the assessee was accepted, and the penalty was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 898 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not justified as the assessee had disclosed all material facts and the claim for depreciation on farm house and commercial flats was made in a bona fide manner. The appeal of the assessee was accepted, and the penalty was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>