<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 888 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, disagreeing with the AO and CIT(A) on treating the entire contract receipt as income. They found the books unreliable and estimated income at Rs. 9,21,000/- using a 6% net profit rate on turnover, instead of the declared loss. This decision provided a balanced approach by estimating income reasonably rather than strictly disallowing deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 888 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, disagreeing with the AO and CIT(A) on treating the entire contract receipt as income. They found the books unreliable and estimated income at Rs. 9,21,000/- using a 6% net profit rate on turnover, instead of the declared loss. This decision provided a balanced approach by estimating income reasonably rather than strictly disallowing deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>