<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 871 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer, in a case concerning excess sugar stock found during a factory visit. The appellant&#039;s explanation of the surplus stock due to a decision to sell at a concessional rate to shareholders was accepted, attributing the excess to a procedural error rather than intentional evasion. The Tribunal noted the Department&#039;s failure to adequately investigate the matter and imposed a penalty for procedural irregularity but waived a penalty equal to the duty, with no redemption fine required. The appellant agreed not to claim a refund of the duty already paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 871 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer, in a case concerning excess sugar stock found during a factory visit. The appellant&#039;s explanation of the surplus stock due to a decision to sell at a concessional rate to shareholders was accepted, attributing the excess to a procedural error rather than intentional evasion. The Tribunal noted the Department&#039;s failure to adequately investigate the matter and imposed a penalty for procedural irregularity but waived a penalty equal to the duty, with no redemption fine required. The appellant agreed not to claim a refund of the duty already paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>