<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 869 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a demand of Rs. 2,82,11,437 with interest and imposed penalties on a company for alleged clandestine clearance of henna products without duty payment. A penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs was also imposed on the company&#039;s director. The dispute centered on the correct classification of products for duty payment, with the Tribunal upholding the Revenue&#039;s classification under Chapter 33 based on the products&#039; intended use for hair coloring. The company was directed to make specified deposits while the remaining financial obligations, interest, and penalties were stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 869 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a demand of Rs. 2,82,11,437 with interest and imposed penalties on a company for alleged clandestine clearance of henna products without duty payment. A penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs was also imposed on the company&#039;s director. The dispute centered on the correct classification of products for duty payment, with the Tribunal upholding the Revenue&#039;s classification under Chapter 33 based on the products&#039; intended use for hair coloring. The company was directed to make specified deposits while the remaining financial obligations, interest, and penalties were stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>