<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 858 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, granting deductions under section 80IB(10) for issues related to built-up area and commercial area, while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It held that for projects commenced before 01.04.2005, the built-up area calculation should exclude terrace area, and the inclusion of commercial area does not disqualify a project if it began before the amendment date. The judgment emphasized that the 01.04.2005 amendments to section 80IB(10) were not retroactively applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 858 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, granting deductions under section 80IB(10) for issues related to built-up area and commercial area, while dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It held that for projects commenced before 01.04.2005, the built-up area calculation should exclude terrace area, and the inclusion of commercial area does not disqualify a project if it began before the amendment date. The judgment emphasized that the 01.04.2005 amendments to section 80IB(10) were not retroactively applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>