<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 857 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A cannot be made if the amount is not claimed as an expense, resulting in the disallowance being deleted. Additionally, the disallowance under Rule 8D(2) for audit fees, general expenses, and conveyance was restricted to the actual expenditure claimed by the appellant, emphasizing the need for a direct nexus between expenditure and income not forming part of total income. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 857 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A cannot be made if the amount is not claimed as an expense, resulting in the disallowance being deleted. Additionally, the disallowance under Rule 8D(2) for audit fees, general expenses, and conveyance was restricted to the actual expenditure claimed by the appellant, emphasizing the need for a direct nexus between expenditure and income not forming part of total income. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>