https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217894 The court held that the writ petition filed by M/s. Saint Gobain Glass India Limited is maintainable, emphasizing the validity of challenging the jurisdiction of the Designated Authority. The court interpreted the term "domestic industry" under Rule 2(b) of the Rules, concluding that the 2010 amendment did not remove the Designated Authority's discretion. Additionally, M/s. DCW Limited, with 4% production, was deemed eligible to maintain an application under the Rules. The judgments allowed W.A. Nos. 193, 194, 189, and 195 of 2012, while dismissing W.A. No. 307 of 2012 and W.A. No. 337 of 2012. en-us Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217894 The court held that the writ petition filed by M/s. Saint Gobain Glass India Limited is maintainable, emphasizing the validity of challenging the jurisdiction of the Designated Authority. The court interpreted the term "domestic industry" under Rule 2(b) of the Rules, concluding that the 2010 amendment did not remove the Designated Authority's discretion. Additionally, M/s. DCW Limited, with 4% production, was deemed eligible to maintain an application under the Rules. The judgments allowed W.A. Nos. 193, 194, 189, and 195 of 2012, while dismissing W.A. No. 307 of 2012 and W.A. No. 337 of 2012. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217894