<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 828 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217890</link>
    <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391(2) &amp;amp; 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between multiple Transferor Companies and a Transferee Company. The Share Exchange Ratio was determined, compliance with legal provisions ensured, and objections addressed. Shareholders and Creditors approved the Scheme, regulatory bodies supported it, and no objections were raised. The Court directed compliance within a specified timeline, approved the transfer of assets, liabilities, and duties to the Transferee Company, and required payment of stamp duty, taxes, and charges. The Petitioner Companies agreed to deposit a sum in the Official Liquidator&#039;s fund voluntarily, concluding the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 828 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217890</link>
      <description>The Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391(2) &amp;amp; 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between multiple Transferor Companies and a Transferee Company. The Share Exchange Ratio was determined, compliance with legal provisions ensured, and objections addressed. Shareholders and Creditors approved the Scheme, regulatory bodies supported it, and no objections were raised. The Court directed compliance within a specified timeline, approved the transfer of assets, liabilities, and duties to the Transferee Company, and required payment of stamp duty, taxes, and charges. The Petitioner Companies agreed to deposit a sum in the Official Liquidator&#039;s fund voluntarily, concluding the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>