<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 795 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217857</link>
    <description>The appellant was deemed eligible for Cenvat credit for the Service Tax paid on GTA services during April 2005 to September 2005 as the service for which the service receiver is liable to pay Service Tax could not be considered as output service post 19/4/2006. Additionally, the appellant was entitled to the credit of Service Tax paid on outward transportation of finished goods from the place of removal during the same period based on a ruling by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Karnataka. The legal interpretations and precedents cited led to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the disposal of the cross objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 795 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217857</link>
      <description>The appellant was deemed eligible for Cenvat credit for the Service Tax paid on GTA services during April 2005 to September 2005 as the service for which the service receiver is liable to pay Service Tax could not be considered as output service post 19/4/2006. Additionally, the appellant was entitled to the credit of Service Tax paid on outward transportation of finished goods from the place of removal during the same period based on a ruling by the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Karnataka. The legal interpretations and precedents cited led to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the disposal of the cross objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>