<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 794 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217856</link>
    <description>Lower authorities failed to consider the Board circulars relied upon by the appellant and the agreement with prospective purchasers, so the dispute required reassessment on that legal basis. The impugned orders were set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication after due observance of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 794 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217856</link>
      <description>Lower authorities failed to consider the Board circulars relied upon by the appellant and the agreement with prospective purchasers, so the dispute required reassessment on that legal basis. The impugned orders were set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication after due observance of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>