https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217854 Clearance by the State Pollution Control Board, State Maritime Board and Atomic Energy Regulatory Board created a presumption that the vessel was free of hazardous or toxic substances, except materials such as asbestos, thermocol and electronic equipment that could surface only during actual dismantling. Physical inspection by the competent authorities, including Customs, supported the clearance. The safeguards directed by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board were treated as reasonable conditions balancing environmental and operational interests. The vessel was permitted to beach and dismantling could proceed after compliance with the authorities' requirements; any toxic waste found during dismantling had to be removed and disposed of immediately at the owner's cost. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217854 Clearance by the State Pollution Control Board, State Maritime Board and Atomic Energy Regulatory Board created a presumption that the vessel was free of hazardous or toxic substances, except materials such as asbestos, thermocol and electronic equipment that could surface only during actual dismantling. Physical inspection by the competent authorities, including Customs, supported the clearance. The safeguards directed by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board were treated as reasonable conditions balancing environmental and operational interests. The vessel was permitted to beach and dismantling could proceed after compliance with the authorities' requirements; any toxic waste found during dismantling had to be removed and disposed of immediately at the owner's cost. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217854