<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 789 - ITAT Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217851</link>
    <description>The case involved a discrepancy in the sale consideration of a property in the real estate business. The Assessing Officer raised concerns about the amounts shown in the books of accounts, leading to an addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Appeals) found no evidence to doubt the transaction&#039;s genuineness and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the business loss based on the actual sale consideration. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination, emphasizing the importance of accurate reflection of sale considerations and fair assessment processes to prevent double taxation and ensure tax justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 789 - ITAT Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217851</link>
      <description>The case involved a discrepancy in the sale consideration of a property in the real estate business. The Assessing Officer raised concerns about the amounts shown in the books of accounts, leading to an addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Appeals) found no evidence to doubt the transaction&#039;s genuineness and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the business loss based on the actual sale consideration. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh examination, emphasizing the importance of accurate reflection of sale considerations and fair assessment processes to prevent double taxation and ensure tax justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>