<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 774 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the failure to specify the manner in which income was derived during the search and seizure operation did not warrant the penalty. Citing relevant case laws and emphasizing the need for proper explanation of provisions during statement recording, the Tribunal concluded that substantial compliance with tax payment suffices. The penalty was deleted in line with a Co-ordinate bench order, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 774 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the failure to specify the manner in which income was derived during the search and seizure operation did not warrant the penalty. Citing relevant case laws and emphasizing the need for proper explanation of provisions during statement recording, the Tribunal concluded that substantial compliance with tax payment suffices. The penalty was deleted in line with a Co-ordinate bench order, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>