<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 773 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217835</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of expenses claimed as capital in nature for AY 2006-07. The disallowance of tender fees and loan processing charges, totaling Rs.1,57,200/- and Rs.37,000/- respectively, was deleted. The ITAT emphasized the distinction between revenue and capital expenditures, highlighting that the expenses were incurred in the regular course of business and not for acquiring any capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 773 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217835</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the disallowance of expenses claimed as capital in nature for AY 2006-07. The disallowance of tender fees and loan processing charges, totaling Rs.1,57,200/- and Rs.37,000/- respectively, was deleted. The ITAT emphasized the distinction between revenue and capital expenditures, highlighting that the expenses were incurred in the regular course of business and not for acquiring any capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>