<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 757 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on all disallowances and additions, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The disallowances for vehicle expenses, traveling and conveyance expenses, telephone expenses, and various other expenses were deemed reasonable due to lack of supporting evidence. The Tribunal found the additions for household expenses justified as the assessee failed to substantiate withdrawals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 757 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on all disallowances and additions, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The disallowances for vehicle expenses, traveling and conveyance expenses, telephone expenses, and various other expenses were deemed reasonable due to lack of supporting evidence. The Tribunal found the additions for household expenses justified as the assessee failed to substantiate withdrawals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>