<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 755 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217817</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed primarily due to the failure to follow proper procedures under Rule 46A of the IT Rules, 1962. The case emphasizes the importance of providing complete and verified documentation to substantiate claims and the necessity of following prescribed procedures in tax assessments for fair and just outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=191191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 755 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217817</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed primarily due to the failure to follow proper procedures under Rule 46A of the IT Rules, 1962. The case emphasizes the importance of providing complete and verified documentation to substantiate claims and the necessity of following prescribed procedures in tax assessments for fair and just outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=217817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>